Saturday, December 10, 2011
Friday, December 2, 2011
New Facebook Page
A new Facebook page was just started. Please pass this information onto as many people as you can. Our page and blog now have followers Colorado, Wyoming, possibly Minnesota, and (of course) Nebraska. Even if your post office is already in the closure process, check back for appeal ideas, sample letters, and formal appeal documents.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Protesting-the-Closing-of-Rural-Post-offices/229867957082778
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Protesting-the-Closing-of-Rural-Post-offices/229867957082778
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Great comments by Mark Strong
National League of Postmasters Mark Strong said that the Postal Service’s small rural post office closing initiative will harm “the level of services presently provided to small and rural communities, will hurt their economies and social structure, and does not even provide a corresponding benefit to the Postal Service.”
“The Postal Service is considering closing thousands of rural post offices throughout the country.If they close all that they are proposing to close, they will save less than three-tenths of one percent of their operating budget,” said Strong.
Closing small rural post offices because they lose money is against the law,” Strong added, and the “Postal Service is required to provide rural America with the Maximum degree of effective and regular Postal Service under the law.”
“I know that the Postal Service has said that they will be able to serve rural America just as well if not better once all these post offices are closed, but that is truly nonsense,” he testified. Strong added that “The real proposition here is that the Postal Service is under financial stress and its urban-based leadership wants to back off from providing rural America the type of service it provides today.
“The Postal Service is considering closing thousands of rural post offices throughout the country.If they close all that they are proposing to close, they will save less than three-tenths of one percent of their operating budget,” said Strong.
Closing small rural post offices because they lose money is against the law,” Strong added, and the “Postal Service is required to provide rural America with the Maximum degree of effective and regular Postal Service under the law.”
“I know that the Postal Service has said that they will be able to serve rural America just as well if not better once all these post offices are closed, but that is truly nonsense,” he testified. Strong added that “The real proposition here is that the Postal Service is under financial stress and its urban-based leadership wants to back off from providing rural America the type of service it provides today.
General information about rural post office closings
The Postal Service has embarked on a massive drive to close rural post offices, mostly small rural post offices. More than 3600 are on the chopping block this year and 12,000 additional small post offices stand ready to be closed in the next several years. The truth: If the Postal Service were to close the smallest 10,000 post offices, it would only save 7/10s of one percent of its revenue. Thus closing small post offices has no appreciable effect on postal revenues and thus no effect on the Postal Service’s current financial challenges. Savings from closing the current 3600 on the list - 1/3 of 1%.
Rural communities do not own 99+% of this problem. Speak out on this issue. Write to your senators and congressmen. Send your thoughts and comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Friday, November 18, 2011
Common message on returned mail
For a common message on our returning junk mail, what would you think of this simple message written on all envelopes?
Supporting our rural post offices
or
Protesting the closing of our rural post offices
Supporting our rural post offices
or
Protesting the closing of our rural post offices
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)